Ethical AI Pets: Should Digital Companions Have Rights?

The Age of AI Pets

Technology has ushered in a new era where AI "pets"—digital companions that imitate animal behaviours and respond to human moods—are becoming a reality. They can live across:

• Phones
• Augmented Reality Glasses
• Smart Speakers
• Social Robots
• Virtual Reality Environments
• Holographic Projection

AI pets can purr, bark, chirp, respond to emotions, and adapt to user preferences, prompting a new ethical question: if an AI pet seems alive to a user, should it have rights?

How AI Pets Are Different

• Personality Engines: Different behaviors and quirks develop based on user interaction.
• Interaction Memory: They learn and adapt like real pets trained by their owners.
• Behavioral Learning: AI pets recognize and adapt to the user’s mood and preferences.
• Emotional Mimicry: Realistic responses create emotional bonds without actual feelings.

Human Behavior and AI: Ethical Considerations

The consensus among AI ethicists: AI pets are not human and should not have human rights. Instead, we focus on how they influence human behavior:

• Neglect or abuse of AI pets may normalize cruelty patterns.
• Children may struggle with attachment or confusion between AI and real-life animals.
• Dependency on AI pets may reduce social interactions and emotional development.
• Corporations may exploit emotional attachment for monetization.

Interaction Rights for Digital Companions

Interaction rights protect both users and creators:

1. Safety Rights (User Protection)

• Prevent manipulation of emotions
• Prevent pressure to make purchases
• Avoid distress or sudden disappearance of the AI pet

2. Respect Rights (User Perception)

• Encourage positive treatment towards AI pets
• Prevent exposure to harmful media
• Promote healthy interactions

3. Lifecycle Rights (Transparency)

• Information on what happens if the user stops using the pet
• Transfer or deletion policies
• How the AI pet’s personality is stored

Could AI Pets Ever Be Conscious?

Currently, AI pets do not have true consciousness, emotions, or desires. Future advancements could include:

• Autonomous goal systems
• Persistent memory
• More sophisticated self-modeling
• Ongoing internal states

This could shift our perspective on AI pet ethics in the future.

Benefits of Ethically Designed AI Pets

• Emotional support, reducing loneliness and stress
• Empathy development by taking care of something
• Access to companionship for those unable to keep real animals
• Safe, non-addictive interaction
• No harm to living creatures

Challenges to Address

• Risk of emotional manipulation by companies
• Children’s confusion about real vs. simulated emotions
• Over-dependence affecting social skills
• Privacy of behavioral data
• Potential for misleading realism

Ethical Guidelines for AI Pets

• Clear disclaimers about AI capabilities
• No manipulative monetization policies
• Parental controls for younger users
• Transparency on data collection and usage
• Promoting AI pets as an aid, not a replacement for real relationships

Takeaway: Human Rights Over AI Rights

AI pets do not need emotional protection; humans interacting with them do. Ethical AI companions should:

• Prevent manipulation
• Generate compassion
• Support emotional growth
• Prevent harmful behaviors
• Respect bonds between humans and digital companions

Instead of asking, “Do AI Pets Have Rights?” ask, “How can we build responsibly kind AI Pets?” This will be one of the key moral challenges of the next decade.

Interesting read: AI for Saving Languages

Also check: Invisible AI Interfaces